Process Mapping and Analysis
Choose useful process views, from business-facing maps to BPMN and APQC.
Explore this guide : Process Mapping and AnalysisSCP expertise / Tools and techniques
Select the right improvement technique for the operating problem.
Our six-stage approach links Define, Understand, Diagnose, Design, Test, prove and embed, and Sustain and improve. Techniques can support more than one stage; the groupings below show a useful starting point.
Total Quality Management provides an organisation-wide view of quality. Lean examines value and flow; Six Sigma brings structured analysis of process performance and variation; Kaizen supports continuing improvement. Just in Time is a flow principle, while Kanban provides replenishment signals within a pull system.
These are established methods, combined here into a proposed SCP approach. The depth of analysis, specialist inputs and delivery scope are agreed around each client engagement.
Method references are linked in each entry. The application examples, groupings and service connections are SCP proposals, rather than endorsements by the source organisations.
Sources reviewed 17 October 2026. This page introduces methods; it does not claim SCP accreditation or replace a client's specialist quality or assurance requirements.
Open a technique for when to use it, its output and related service links.
Which lanes, products or failure types account for the problem?
Prioritised analysis.
Split failures by lane, product, site or reason to choose where to investigate first.
How variable are lead times or losses?
Distribution and tail view.
Examine long-tail transit times rather than relying on the average alone.
Is performance changing, stable or showing unusual variation?
Time-based signals.
Monitor delivery or exception-resolution time and investigate unusual signals.
What possible causes should we investigate?
Hypothesis map.
Organise possible causes of late orders, then test the important branches.
What evidence-supported chain explains an incident?
Cause/action record.
Follow the evidence behind a recurring shortage rather than stopping at a symptom.
Which factors merit further investigation?
Relationship model.
Explore associations between delays, workload and shipment characteristics.
Can a stable process meet a defined specification?
Capability assessment.
Assess whether a stable operation can meet an agreed timing or quality requirement.
How could the process fail, and where should prevention focus?
Risk/action register.
Examine potential supplier, process or automation failures and prevention actions.
Can a team explain the problem, reasoning, action and follow-up coherently?
Shared improvement record.
Keep the problem, evidence, countermeasure and follow-up together in one record.
How should a recurring supplier or customer issue be contained and resolved?
Structured corrective-action record.
Coordinate containment and corrective action after a recurring supplier or delivery incident.
Do layout, organisation or unclear locations cause errors?
Workplace standards and review.
Improve locations, labels and workplace organisation to reduce picking confusion.
How does workload compare with the required pace?
Capacity and workload view.
Compare demand pace with picking, packing or replenishment workload.
What should trigger replenishment, and in what quantity?
Explicit signal and replenishment rules.
Trial a clear replenishment signal with agreed quantities and service safeguards.
Can sequencing reduce uneven workload?
Feasible levelled schedule.
Assess whether a more even production mix can reduce workload peaks.
Which setup tasks can be shortened or performed outside the stoppage?
Changeover plan.
Separate setup tasks that require a stoppage from those that can be prepared beforehand.
How should teams execute and improve the agreed method?
Work standard and training.
Document and train an agreed picking or exception-response method.
Can an error be prevented or immediately detected?
Tested prevention control.
Test controls that prevent wrong-item selection or make it immediately visible.
When should a process stop or seek an authorised decision?
Escalation and response rules.
Define when an abnormal event should stop a process or trigger authorised action.
Are equipment losses disrupting flow?
Loss analysis and maintenance priorities.
Analyse equipment losses that disrupt warehouse flow or dispatch.
Which policies balance availability and stock across locations?
Policy/scenario comparison.
Compare stock policies across locations against customer-service requirements.
Which locations, flows or routes meet constraints?
Modelled options.
Compare locations, routes or flows within capacity and service constraints.
Did the change behave as expected?
Documented learning and next decision.
Record a prediction, run a bounded trial and review what actually happened.
Who checks performance and reacts to deterioration?
Measures, owners and response plan.
Assign owners, measures and response rules so improvements persist.
Explore how these techniques could support your operation, with the scope and depth agreed around your needs.